Short answers to how RoadScope uses official mobile camera corridor data, how the tools work, and what the platform is — and is not — intended to do.
Send a quick message below. This will open Gmail with your message pre-filled to RoadScope.
RoadScope is a transparency and planning tool that visualises officially approved mobile camera corridors across Victoria. It lets users explore where corridors exist, why they were approved, and how those corridors interact with real-world driving routes.
RoadScope is not a navigation replacement or a legal authority. It is designed to support situational awareness and planning by making published approval data easier to interpret visually.
All corridor, category, and approval data displayed on RoadScope is derived from official Victorian government publications, including materials released by VicRoads and associated transport and road-safety authorities.
RoadScope does not generate, modify, or create corridor approvals. It only visualises what has already been publicly released. (On the live site, this section will include direct links to the relevant VicRoads mobile-camera publications.)
RoadScope updates its datasets on a monthly cycle, aligned with official publication updates. When new approval documents are released, they are processed and reflected in the platform.
This means RoadScope represents a recent snapshot of the publicly available approval framework, but it does not reflect real-time operational enforcement activity.
View Map is the public transparency layer. It lets anyone visually explore approved corridors and reason categories in a clean, readable format, without routing or optimisation.
Full Access adds an active trip-planning environment. It introduces route options, highlighted-road awareness, avoidance controls, and time-on-corridor visibility so users can adjust how much of a given trip is spent on highlighted corridors.
When a route is generated in Full Access, the system calculates several viable paths between the chosen locations using the road network together with the published corridor approval data.
Instead of one fixed answer, RoadScope presents multiple route options that differ in both travel time and corridor exposure. Users can compare these side by side and choose the route that best matches their driving priorities.
The tolerance slider controls how strongly highlighted corridors influence route selection once route options have been generated.
At lower settings, time spent on highlighted corridors is treated as a weaker constraint and routes will more closely follow the fastest baseline. At higher settings, the system increasingly prioritises routes that reduce corridor overlap, even if this increases travel time.
The slider does not change the underlying road network or corridor locations — it only changes how strongly avoidance is applied when ranking the available routes.
The map shows the official reason categories attached to corridor groups. These are policy labels, not live measurements:
A — Crash history danger. Indicates that the corridor is linked to a documented crash-risk context. The map reflects the presence of this label; it is not a current crash prediction.
B — Verified complaints focus. Used where complaints have been formally recorded and validated through official channels. It reflects a policy justification, not a live measure of driver behaviour.
C — Police intel site. Indicates that the corridor listing is supported by enforcement intelligence. The map only shows that this label exists; it does not reveal operational or tactical details.
D — Road / environment risk. Used when road layout, environmental factors, or surrounding conditions are recorded as contributing risks.
Corridor visibility in RoadScope follows the approval mapping, not roadside signs or fixed infrastructure. Some corridors may not appear visibly enforced at the time of travel because of mobile deployment patterns, scheduling, or operational changes.
RoadScope does not adjust corridor placement based on visibility. It displays formally approved and published locations only.
RoadScope reproduces the most recent published approval datasets available at the time of update. Real-world changes such as new road layouts, temporary works, or GPS alignment differences can introduce small discrepancies.
If a corridor placement or label appears incorrect, users can flag it via the contact or feedback channels. Reported issues are checked against the source documents before any correction is made.
Yes. View Map is free as a public transparency layer.
Full Access is a paid upgrade that unlocks routing tools, exposure analysis, avoidance controls, and advanced comparison features. Current pricing and inclusions are shown on the home page.
RoadScope displays approval data, not enforcement schedules, and cannot confirm camera presence at any specific time. Historical approvals may become inactive or be rotated operationally.
RoadScope supports awareness and planning only. It is not a prediction tool, does not provide legal advice, and does not replace drivers’ responsibility to obey all road rules and posted speed limits.